Some of you might be wondering what’s happened to the Senate Bill mandating Electronic On Board Recorders (EOBRs) for commercial trucks. You remember — the bill I was so excited about when it was introduced. (Click on the word excited to read my Sept 29 blog.)
Back then I told you that finally someone in the Senate was listening and was brave enough to buck the American Trucking Association; a group dead set against any installation of the monitoring device. I was excited by the fact that a bill was being introduced and finally we might have a chance to make a big change that would save lives.
But even during my initial euphoria there hovered in the back of my mind the feeling that it was odd the two Senators bringing this to the floor were not people our group had worked with over the years, not Senators known to be active safety advocates. Still, it was something of a gift, this bill – and I was elated. It didn’t matter, I thought, who introduces the bill if it resulted in EOBRs on trucks.
Turns out it DOES matter who introduces the bill. Turns out you have to look at all things political carefully. Turns out I was naive.
Because guess what? Tucked into the middle of this bill was material that would make it illegal to use any information accumulated by the EOBR in any civil case a family might file against a truck company. That would be like saying you can’t use the information gathered by the black boxes on airplanes to sue an airline after a crash, that you wouldn’t be able to use information from the black boxes on cars to sue an insurance carrier after someone hits you. Turns out that the American Trucking Association knows that EOBRs are inevitable and they are trying to get their version of a bill passed before anyone notices that they’re not actually becoming more safety conscious. That in fact they’re trying to cover themselves while looking like they’re concerned for the safety of people on the roads.
I am so frustrated. And angry and sad and mystified. Powerful organizations like the ATA are just so hard to fight when you’re just a little nonprofit. They’ve got money and they aren’t afraid to use it. But they didn’t count on this little nonprofit actually having someone (not me!) read the proposed bill.
And so the fight is on. Though right now it’s more like a waiting game then a fight. And every day we wait another 14 or so people die in crashes with commercial trucks. How many more does it take before we really get noticed?
I’ll keep you posted.

November 11, 2010 at 8:16 pm
It strikes me that this is another example of how we are not really represented at all. The lobbyists, those with the big bucks, are represented!
LikeLike
November 11, 2010 at 10:05 pm
Oh Dawn, I’m so sorry. 😦
LikeLike
November 12, 2010 at 5:27 am
This is exactly why it is so hard to get anything done in Washington. A bill just can’t be a bill. They are always full of nonsense, hidden deep inside the many pages that no one ever reads. Unfortunately, it almost always comes down to money~the heartbeat of America.
How frustrating and heartbreaking for you. I know you won’t give up though. I admire your perserverence.
LikeLike
November 12, 2010 at 6:56 am
There is something very wrong with the way bills are put together and named. This is why campaign slams against legislators who voted “for” or “against” whatever are more heat than light. All kinds of riders are smuggled in. I did go back and read your earlier post, Dawn, guessing–rightly, as it turned out–that some personal stake kept you attuned to this legislation. I’m so sorry. But now, is there any way to stop the bill in this form from getting passed? Do you belong to a group that is fighting it?
LikeLike
November 12, 2010 at 7:12 am
I am so sorry to hear this but unfortunately not surprised.
LikeLike
November 12, 2010 at 9:05 am
I’m so sorry to hear about this, Dawn!!!
LikeLike
November 12, 2010 at 10:33 am
wow, that is just crazy, hope for the sake of how many families in the future that could be protected….that somehow this all gets fixed……
LikeLike
November 12, 2010 at 1:16 pm
I’m sorry, too, Dawn! 😦
LikeLike
November 12, 2010 at 7:31 pm
Thanks everyone. We’re working on getting the bill changed…and if we can’t get it changed we’ll work on getting it defeated. Sad. But of course we won’t give up. Anything worthwhile is worth fighting for. And safety on our roads is definitely worth fighting for.
LikeLike
November 12, 2010 at 8:33 pm
Good on you for reading, thinking, understanding and then acting on what you have learnt. Keep fighting.
LikeLike
November 13, 2010 at 1:03 am
So sorry to hear this, Dawn. Please keep us posted and let us know if there’s anything we can do to help.
LikeLike
November 13, 2010 at 9:39 am
That’s terrible. I’m sorry to hear about that. It’s nice to hear that you are not giving up.
LikeLike
November 15, 2010 at 5:01 pm
Good luck on getting that changed.
LikeLike
November 17, 2010 at 3:54 pm
Good on ya, Dawn! A few years back, my (very) elderly mother was hit from behind by an 18-wheeler. Her car was compressed into less than half its length (the spare tire in the trunk/boot was touching the back of the front seats) by the collision. The trucker didn’t stop, but somebody got his license plate number and the state police stopped him about 30 miles down the road. He first claimed that he hadn’t hit anybody, but they found evidence on the truck that he had hit my mother’s car. Then he claimed that he didn’t notice anything out of the ordinary, but the witnesses told the cops that he hit her car and then swerved all over the road because of the impact. Then he claimed that she pulled off the side of the road right in front of him and he couldn’t avoid her; the witnesses put the lie to that as well.
His final claim was that his company would refuse to pay and they would back him up all the way. Well, he finally got one right. The company did refuse to pay and claimed that my mother was making it all up to scam the company. After the case was a couple of years old and just days from going to trial, the company finally settled for a pittance.
Had there been an EOBR in the truck (and no law prohibiting its use by victims), this would have been a slam dunk. As it was, my mother got just enough from the trucking company to buy a used vehicle similar to the one in which she was hit. Oh, and the trucking company claimed that her broken neck had nothing to do with the accident…it was just an “existing condition”!
Keep up the pressure, Dawn!
LikeLike
November 17, 2010 at 10:38 pm
Will do Jim. In her honor as well as my Dad’s. Though I know she wasn’t killed in the crash I’m sure it effected her the rest of her life. To survive something like that changes the way a person sees life, thinks, the fears we have..it changes everything.
LikeLike